Dances with Wolves (1990)

Dances with Wolves (1990)I remember very little of my first encounter with Dances with Wolves (1990) whilst in my last year at art school, catching it. It played out very differently in my head, still that’s what memory can do to you when you cram in full of films, all those images, quotes and music running through you’re mind. It was time for a rematch, one that reminded me of what I have long missed. After watching Little Big Man (1970) this falls well into place in the genre. The main theme of a white man living with a Native American tribe, for Jack Crabbe (Dustin Hoffman) it was the synonymously violent Comanches, for Lt John Dunbar/Dances with Wolves (Kevin Costner) with the Sioux who are the very opposite until pushed to go to war with the Pawnee the exotic violent tribe of the film. Wolves goes into far more detail in terms of time that a white man spends being absorbed into the culture of the usual western other. The other which is seen as a savage obstacle to be overcome in the myth of conquest. We usually spend little time with Natives, earlier films such as Broken Arrow (1950) which moved back and forth between whites and the other (Apaches).

Wolves really delves into an overlooked part in it’s countries history, guided in front and behind the camera by Costner with sensitivity and grace. On screen it’s in the form of Lt John Dunbar a possible coward during the civil war, who becomes a war hero who falls for the life of the sioux on the open plains of the untouched frontier. Theres already a sense of loss in the air, the inevitable in coming, the Sioux and other nations submitting to life on reservations. If not wiped/rubbed out in the years before. Our lead character is more open than any other in the history of the west, it’s not just a sympathy for his misunderstood neighbour, it’s a real understanding that takes the first half of the film to allow him to leave his own culture and past to start a fresh life. As if he has met someone, married and moved in, cutting off his family in the process.

The idea that the Sioux are a dangerous nation is soon brushed aside with the Pawnee who are the classic enemy of the film, killing in the opening act, suggesting that they will be back for more. Their depiction is far from reality, probably a studio compromise to still have an Indian enemy only to the Sioux however. We never truly leave the stereotype, instead just touch on it when needed for conflict.

The journey is long, long enough to be swept away into a world and culture that is usually overlooked in film (as I’ve already mentioned) allowing us to make up for all of that. Costner’s Dunbar is our gateway into that culture, an open minded figure, disillusioned by his past life in the uniform of a solider who started the film on an operating table, where he could have easily have died. Comes alive on the fort where he has been posted, empty of other soldiers he keeps account of his time in a journal that acts as narration for the audience to understand his state of mind as he leaves one life in favour of another. Theres no question of becoming a “Human Being” as in Little Big Man he simply is accepted as a Sioux after a period of acceptance, breaking down the barrier of language and culture to discover understanding, something that is usually seen as another bunch of savages who won’t conform to the western way of life that is spreading across the land.

The landscape is another character in this revisionist western that looks at the open prairie as land that has all but been claimed for the white man. The buffalo we can see are slowly being wiped out, you don’t need to see a buffalo hunter riding off, the aftermath of the skinned beasts is enough to get you. Everything about this film is to make you understand their plight, not just of the Sioux but every other nation that has surrendered to white Americans who tamed the country.

There is indeed a flip side to all the great images of gunfighters, gold rushes, cattle drives and the rail-road, there had to be a price for all that. Not just on their side, we see what would have happened to Debbie Edwards (Natalie Wood) of The Searchers (1956) if she remained with her captors, not a fate worse than death, as we discover for Stands with a Fist (Mary McDonnell) a victim of a Pawnee raid that was found by the Sioux, and raised as their own. Very much the same as Jack Crabbe who too came to not just sympathise but stand with his natural enemy as one the other who he was taught to hate and kill on sight. All that fades away when you look beyond the myths and stories that are constructed to create fear in a culture on and off film that has become part of the fabric.

Dances with Wolves stands alone able to not just entertain but make us think about our pasts, not just America but other nations who have altered the future of other nations, who as primitive as they may seem were moved without consent. I know thats a generalising of far more complex issues of history. Wolves is an attempt to re-write the myth of conquest to say this too might have happened, even a white solider may have left his own culture to join another nation that lived there hundreds of years before the 1600’s. We know what will happen, its inevitable as I have said numerous times, history tells us that. If only for a few hours we see into a now lost world brought to life with respect, grace and heart for all who want peace.

Related Articles 

12 responses

  1. Pingback: Professor Neil Campbell (Discussion 22/3/12) | timneath

  2. A lot of people get on this movie’s case for beating out Goodfellas, and while most of it is deserved, the fact is that this movie’s still pretty great. If a tad too long. Good review.

    October 23, 2014 at 1:29 am

    • The length is not an issue for me, i think it has to be long to get everything in, without rushing. Cheer Dan,

      October 23, 2014 at 10:12 am

  3. Awesome commentary, Tim! This is one of my favorite films, certainly of the 90s. It’s a perfect film. So much better than Avatar. The wiping out of a culture, either through assimilation or death permeates World History and colonization. As you astutely say, it’s an American story that took place around the world– a Universal Story indeed.
    Okay, you gave me the impetus for my next post. Thanks, mate 🙂

    October 23, 2014 at 2:36 am

    • Glad I’ve inspired you Cindy. Its tonnes better than Avatar, (not looking forward to the abundance of sequels). Its something we can’t ignore and beautifully directed.

      October 23, 2014 at 10:13 am

  4. A very good Western really. One that I watch again on occasion.

    Tim, did you know that there’s a 4 hour extended version !? Yeah. LOL. Have to watch it in 2 installments I guess.

    October 23, 2014 at 4:25 am

    • I never knew this, Think I’d have to do the same as you. Did the extended cut add anything to it?

      October 23, 2014 at 10:15 am

  5. I love this film. The extended cut has some nice scenes that really elaborate on the past of some of the characters. Great writing.

    October 26, 2014 at 10:19 pm

    • I see what you mean, maybe I should seek out the dvd with the extended cut.

      October 27, 2014 at 10:03 am

  6. Yes it must add quite a bit. I haven’t worked up enough steam to watch that version, to be honest. The original movie was about 3 hours long.

    October 27, 2014 at 3:45 am

    • Might seek out it out for the next time I want to watch it. Be like you a two part sitting, or a long day-watch.

      October 27, 2014 at 10:04 am

  7. Pingback: Professor Neil Campbell (Discussion 22/3/12) | Tim Neath - Visual Artist

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s